David McCann

Never Seen Before Evidence – 9/11 – The “Hidden Airport in Masonic Footprint”

Despite all the previous arguments and evidence presented to date that clearly shows the American government’s own official storyline on what had happened on 9/11, is far from true, and that it was what is often termed; “an inside job”; - though what I'm about to reveal adds even more intrigue to this mystery and a rather sinister edge to it all. 

This article is not for the novice on the subject of 9/11; as I don’t really want to cover the already exhausted evidence presented to the world by the many excellent truthers who have dedicated, if not their lives in the process of trying to expose what really took place that fateful day on 9/11 – 2001, they have spent hours, months or even years researching the subject, so what I’m trying to say is there is an abundance of evidence already been compiled and incredible films made and uploaded to websites such a youtube and alike for anyone to find out what really occurred that tragic day. 

For those who do not know of me; I’m the author of Trapped in a Masonic World, it took three years to write its 360,000 words and as long to research it.  It, and I was banned from various so called truth sites, including 9/11 Truth on Facebook, and publishers wouldn’t touch it with a bargepole.   I begin to write the book which was to be about 9/11, however, whenever I did any research as to who was really running this world, that it become blatantly obvious the Freemasons and its thousands of affiliates are the ones that do.  Of course they are NOT all “in on it”, - 99% of them have been hoodwinked, - though it’s their mere existence that keeps the same 1% of the fraternity always in power and control. 

And I am not referring to the Freemasons being behind 9/11, as I will no doubt be accused of.  In the above book I just mentioned; I clearly explain that almost every member of our worldwide governments are also members of the very same secret society, that being the Freemasons.- This well proven and known about fact is hardly my fault, you can't going around shooting the messenger just because they remind you of this fact.

I decided to give Trapped in a Masonic World away free in its PDF format.  I never got around to publishing what I found-out about 9/11, and have filed my research away.  I was to include the following information I had discovered in the new book, so have sat on this observation for some years. 

My last book A Madness Shared by Two, proves a police cover-up in the case of the Swedish Eriksson twins, who were captured on film throwing themselves into the oncoming traffic on the M6 motorway in the UK in May 2008.  Despite their horrific injuries and experience, Sabina Eriksson was released from hospital after only five hours, whilst her twin Ursula lay in intensive care with life threatening injuries. Hours later it's alleged Sabina bumped into a man in the street, went back to his home, then stabbed him four times in the heart and chest the very next day.  His name was Glenn Hollinshead.  As said; the book reveals a cover-up and that two police officers lied on TV, and that the hospital concerned, alongside the BBC and Mentorn productions, the makers of the film Madness in the Fast Lane, seem to have colluded and helped cover-up what it is I have since discovered and revealed, - and what the book is based on.  I conclude Sabina Eriksson was innocent of Mr Hollinsheads' murder or manslaughter in which after 16 months on remand she pleaded guilty to, dispite protesting her innocence prior and right up until the final day of trial, and when I believe a "deal" with the police and prosecution was made.  I further believe the 'real' killer/s are still on the loose and were never even looked for by the police, - as it was far more convenient to blame and convict Sabina, whilst covering up a massive police operation I suspect the twins were embroiled in. 

Back in 2008, Professor Paul Zarembka, author of the Hidden History of 9/11, thanked me for correcting a common error which appeared in his book, and in many other articles, publications and websites worldwide.  I was the first person to discover and prove this error was the case.  He at first thought I was Professor David McCann from Yale University.  This mis/disinformation is still believed by many; that there were ‘two’ aircraft sharing the same tail number.  Though as said; I showed this wasn’t the case as it was the ‘time-zones’ that gave it that impression.  Tail Number N591UA has been widely misinterpreted as being the aircraft seen in two separate places - but at the same time, when in fact it was not, it was always the ‘same’ aircraft. 

There is also a strong camp, who believe hologram airplanes were used, and as crazed as this may sound, technology exists to make this possible.  I can't see that being the case here, though cannot dismiss this line of thought by those others.

There's even data that proves the original flight data has been 'doctored' to produce the incorrect results, though I have detected it. There's also an abundance of evidence that backs-up the claims that the 2nd aircraft that hit the Twin Towers was a dark-grey – military aircraft, and NOT a commercial airplane; many witnesses have clearly stated and described this aircraft in the above video.

Though again I'm not really discussing this kind of problem - as I want to concentrate on the actual alleged "location" and the "aircraft" said to be used that day and not all the obvious points that have long been covered and already available to be seen. 

The most likely theory that UAV - ‘drones’ [unmanned aerial vehicle, colloquially known as a drone] were used is the most feasible explanation to date.  You only have to see how commonplace they are and in their smaller variants.  The world record for an unmanned flight of a commercial aircraft has long been broken; - proving this kind of sized aircraft can be flown by remote control and from the comfort of another place and by simply using a computer.   

So if "we" are to agree that "drones" [replicas of the airplanes they were imitating] were used, then they had to take-off from somewhere? 

There also had to be a place where the ���other” alleged ‘original’ aircraft, laden with “passengers” [mixture of military and secret servicemen and women], - had landed.  The same applies to the alleged airplane that crashed into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; despite evidence concluding this couldn’t have happened that way. 

Apart from it being disintegrated by some kind of energy weapon, like that suggested by Dr Judy Woods, no aircraft of that size and particularly the one in question could have crashed into that field they way they say it did. 

The same must be said about the alleged aircraft crashing into the Pentagon, evidence proves this was impossible to have occurred the way it’s been officially reported.  Therefore, on all the evidence I have seen to date and I have studied and researched on this subject - and in-depth since 2005, - for prior to this time I too fell for the “official storyline.”  I too accepted the whole 9/11 thing as being what it was reported as; ‘a terrorist attack’.  Though this is clealry no longer the case, as I am now 100% convinced 9/11 was what many others have long been saying; “An inside job" indeed!

What often has thrown many others off the scent and right track, is the matter of how could this take place, and with so many others involved.  But the biggest poser so far, was; as I have found an explanation as to what must have happened to the “real” aircraft if they didn’t actually crash into the Twin Towers, Pentagon or a field in Shanksville themselves, and where they must have ended up going to.   

The four flights involved needed a flight-path – that on the surface of it; appeared they had departed their due airports and were on the way to their original destinations.  We know recorded evidence seems to prove two of the actual aircraft never even departed their respected airports.  However, we have to work on the premise that four aircraft, whatever they are, as it’s no more difficult to repaint an aircraft and give it a false tail number, than it is to do the same with a stolen motor vehicle, - must have departed to give it the impression they were involved in the crashes. 

So where on earth must they have gone to if they weren’t involved in the actually incidents? 

This means the original four aircraft [though only two, if two never took off] - and then two drones to replace the ones alleged to have crashed into the World Trade Centre Twin Towers.  This means the possibilty that six aircraft were involved.  No aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed into the field in Shanksville, though these two aircraft would have needed to have gone elsewhere.  By having two replacement aircraft to hit the towers, makes it that the four actual planes involved not hitting anything, - and only two drone planes needed to strike the towers. 

[Even less if the 'hologram camp' are right!]

This is six aircraft in total, the original four planes - along with the destroying of two military drones.  There's the possiblity that a smaller plane or drone crashed at Shankville, but appears more likely to have been either an explosion inside a pre-made hole filled with old debris of aircraft parts, or it too was a missile that  also appears to have hit the Pentagon, following pre-planted bombs in certain part of the building, and what too many witnessess have claimed really happened that day.

If you were to devise such a mastermind plan for  9/11, you’d need ‘a base’, not so much where to control and give orders from, but a place where you could have full control over the whole plan and all the aircraft involved.  One that ensnared a whole area you confidently have supremacy over, one that would uphold to your rituals and allow you to use the powerful use of symbolism, so as you can clearly show whose in complete command and control, - this will be your footprint.

The place you'd need to use would have to be close enough to where all the original aircraft were heading to.  Other airports have been suggested, though I guess they are wrong, - red herrings, or genuine mistakes. 

Within this secure footprint you’ll see the “drones” take-off, whilst also being able to see the “replaced” aircraft that the drones had taken over the flight-paths-of, along with its “passengers” – and then landing at your controlled site.  This obviously requires an airport with the facilities to carry out such a task. 

You’d want to disperse your “passengers” – that if what I’m saying is true; were probably a combination of genuine and false people – secret servicemen and woman of the military or their related agencies, - and see to it these people are then dealt with and in whatever way you had preplanned for them. 

Out of the hundreds of airports, towns and places I have researched and studied, I’ve concluded only one could be befitting enough that would help fit the needs to make sure this kind of operation could be successfully accomplished.  One that fits in with all the timings, that allowed flights to take off and land in sequence like they did on 9/11, - that the recorded flight activity that day at the airport, proves this could have possibly been achieved.

Here for the first time ever and being the only person to date to suggest such findings; - I would like to announce that in my opinion this place is ‘Harrisburg International Airport’, in Pennsylvania, USA, that could have been supported by the Capital City Airport, also in Harrisburg, this latter airport could have homed the two "drone" aircraft that hit the Twin Towers.  The former could have dealt with the other commercial aircraft involved.

Birds-eye view of Harrisburg International Airport

This is a birds-eye view of the Capital City Airport in Harrisburg on the opposite side of the Susquehanna River to Harrisburg International Airport.  Originally called Capital Landing Field, the facility opened in mid-1930 and was Harrisburg's original commercial service airport.  Capital City Airport is located adjacent to the Defense Distribution Center, one of the largest military distribution centers for the warehousing of supplies and equipment for the U.S. Armed Forces. A parachutte rigger detachment from the 82nd Airborne Division also operates out of Capital City Airport.

Since 1999, Capital City Airport has been owned and operated by the Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority (SARAA).

I am not using the following Masonic pyramid “symbolic" meaning as backing up my argument or as being concrete evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, for I mainly want to highlight and conclude Harrisburg International Airport & Capital City Airport as probably being the base/s involved on 9/11, - and purely on its own merits and the very specific convenient location of these airports.

It’s surrounded by military camps and other airports, alongside many industries related to the government and its military complex that employs thousands of local people in the community, it and the whole area is capable of being able to see that this type of plan was carried out in relative seclusion and under strict military control.

In 2010 Forbes rated Harrisburg as the second best place in the U.S. to raise a family, and The Daily Beast website ranked 20 metropolitan areas across the country as being recession-proof, and the Harrisburg region landed at No. 7. The financial stability of the region is in partly due to the high concentration of state and government agencies, such as the military who occupy huge amounts of land and where there are both army-camps and residential dwellings where many of their families were born and bred.  

Symbolism is everything to those who control us.  It speaks volumes to those who understand it.  We already know of the Masonic road-layout and design of such cities like that of Washington and London; that from a birds-eye view can easily be seen.

In regards to the USA, we all take it that at the tip of the pyramid; resides those in power = Washington DC, Capital Hill.  There are those who argue that the ‘real power’ comes out of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia; that then filters down to the Grand Lodge of Washington. 

As you can see by my own photographs; I first went to Google maps, typed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the site of the alleged crash of Flight 93, - this is seen below in the red marker balloon "A".

Then look to your right an you’ll see Harrisburg.  Lower right is Philadelphia, and below centre is Washington D.C. – now join the dots! 

I drew a straight line between Shanksville to Harrisburg, then a line from Harrisburg to Philadelphia, a line from Philadelphia to Washington, and then from Washington to Shanksville, - finally drawing a straight line from Washington to Harrisburg; - this gives it that unique-three dimensional pyramid shape when you turn the map upside down!

Never Seen Before Evidence - 9/11 - "Hidden Aiport in Masonic Footprint"

If it’s not intentional, then what a coincidence! 

An exact pyramid shape, even with a 3d effect!  Make what you like of it, but it speaks volumes to me.  And no, I will not accept the argument that you'll find the exact shape on many other maps; - this "pyramid" has a signifcance value of four, and at the four points; - it is therefore beyond coincidence, being accidental or by mere chance.

For you tell me; what are the real odds for this to coincidently occur?

Now - can you help? 

As you can see; the above pyramid covers four points - the 'fifth' lower cornerstone has not yet been identified?  Does anyone know what "place" could be at the precise area of the fifth corner?

I hope evidence like this will help refuel the debate, and a demand into what really happened on 9/11 will take place, - and that a full and independent inquiry is held, contucted by members of the general public and not government paid officials - and filmed live on TV. 

Do share this article. - Though please note: I own the copyright to the photographs and material I have written, though agree for others to freely reproduce such material though as long as it's not for commercial gain purposes - and based on the understanding that you will acredit the original source and understanding of the copyright belonging to that of author David McCann.



Greater Harrisburg Pennsylvania Area military establishments include Mechanicsburg NAVICP Naval Depot, New Cumberland Army Depot, Carlisle Barracks and War College. The nearby Three Mile Island facility was site of a nuclear accident in 1979.

New Cumberland Army Depot (NCAD) is located on 850 acres near Harrisburg. The New Cumberland Site encompasses three DLA entities: Defense Distribution Region East (DDRE) Headquarters [which was dis-established in 1998], Administrative Support Center East (ASCE), and Defense Distribution Depot Susquehanna Pennsylvania (DDSP).

The installation encompasses 851 acres along the Susquehanna River in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania about 5 miles south of Harrisburg. The depot is bordered by the Susquehanna River to the north and east, the Pennsylvania Turnpike to the south, the Capital City Airport to the north and west, and a residential community to the west. Facilities within the installation include over 200 buildings, 26 miles of road, and 18 miles of railroad. The installation employs about 3,000 civilian and 100 military personnel, making it one of the area's top 10 employers. The impact on central Pennsylvania's economy is significant. with more than $240 million per year spent on payroll and related expenses.

The Quartermaster Department had originally built the depot at New Cumberland in 1918, naming it the Marsh Run Storage Depot. The installation was used as a storage and distribution point for supplies to and from Europe during WWI. After World War I it was designated an Army Reserve Depot for the storage of quartermaster, signal, ordnance, engineering, and chemical wear materiel. In 1960, aircraft hangar and maintenance shops were constructed for U.S. Army helicopters and other aircraft. In 1962, the installation's name changed to New Cumberland Army Depot (NCAD). During the Vietnam War, the New Cumberland Army Depot primarily focused on overhaul/repair of the CH-47 Chinook helicopter, especially the rotor blades. In April 1976, the Department of the Army announced the possible realignment of the Aircraft Depot Maintenance workload at New Cumberland to Corpus Christi, Texas. This consolidation move would concentrate all Aircraft maintenance into a prime facility constructed for the sole purpose of maintaining aircraft. Aircraft repair for the Mohawk OV, UTE-21, Cayuse OH-58, and components for several aircraft were transferred to Corpus Christi. Some maintenance work was also commercially contracted out.

In 1984, aircraft maintenance operations were discontinued, and NCAD's mission was modified to function solely as a major supply depot. The phase-out of the Rotor blade program at New Cumberland and its transfer to Corpus Christi was completed by October 1, 1985. New Cumberland participated in the U.S. Army's Operation Dragon Tail in 1990 by delivering supplies directly from the wholesale level to awaiting soldiers on the ground at Fort Bragg, NC. In 1991, NCAD merged into DLA, and the name of the depot was changed to DDRE-New Cumberland Site. In 1992, the New Cumberland Army Depot transferred from the U.S. Army Depot System Command (DESCOM) to the Defense Logistic Agency (DLA). The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) nominated DDRE-New Cumberland Site for the FY96 Secretary of Defense Environmental Security Award, for the category of "Environmental Cleanup for an Installation."

DRMS and its customers continue to reap benefits from implementation of the Recycling Control Point (RCP), an automated process for disposal of excess personal property stored in DLA's distribution depots. Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland and Defense Distribution Depot Mechanicsburg, both in central Pennsylvania, are the latest sites where RCP is operating, bringing nine depots into this automated world. Implementation of RCP at these last two depots coincided with a pilot program developed in coordination with GSA to improve the RCP program.

Strategically positioned near the center of the Philadelphia/ Baltimore/Pittsburgh "triangle" and within easy access of most northeastern U.S. urban centers, Harrisburg is the hub of a metropolitan area having more than 500,000 people. Established in 1785, Harrisburg became the state's capital in 1812 and was incorporated as a city in 1860. Harrisburg was said to be the objective of General Robert E. Lee as he and his troops marched northward in 1863. only to be called to Gettysburg before crossing the Susquehanna River. Its location, and resulting transportation benefits, coupled with the city as the seat of the state and county governments, make Harrisburg not only a major business and political centre, but a community in which the quality of life is excellent. In the last decade, Harrisburg has experienced a phenomenal resurgence with more than $850 million invested in new construction, ehabilitation and economic growth.

Source: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/new-cumberland.htm

On the same side of Harriburg International Airport and not far from Captial Airport opposite is the US Secret Services offices at 228 Walnut Street # 400 Harrisburg, PA 17101-1736 map

About US Secret Service Phone: (717) 221-4411 

Top 5 Federal Government-Police near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

US Secret Service in Harrisburg, PA is a private company categorised under Federal Government-Police.  Companies like US Secret Service usually offer:

  1. US Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms

  2. US Department of Justice

  3. Federal Bureau-Investigation

  4. Federal Bureau-Investigation

  5. Federal Bureau Of Investigation


The Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) was an automated control system for tracking and intercepting enemy bomber aircraft used by NORAD from the late 1950s into the 1980s. In later versions, the system could automatically direct aircraft to an interception by sending instructions directly to the aircraft’s autopilot.

In normal operation, communications between the SAGE centers and the interceptor aircraft was relayed via radio equipment at the radar sites, which were more widely spread out than the SAGE centers themselves. A properly equipped aircraft, like the F-106 Delta Dart, could feed the SAGE directions into the autopilot and fly “hands off” to the interception.

NASA and the FAA flew a plane by remote control in 1984;

"In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) teamed-up in a unique flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), to test the impact of a Boeing 720 aircraft using standard fuel with an additive designed to suppress fire."

"On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent-to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8-degree glide slope."

Indeed, prior to 9/11, remote-controlled planes could fly up to 8,600 miles (from the April 24, 2001 edition of Britain’s International Television News).

One day after 9/11, an article appeared on the top science and technology news service stating; “hijackings could be halted in progress with existing technologies, say aviation researchers”. The article quoted a transportation expert as saying:

“Most modern aircraft have some form of autopilot that could be re-programmed to ignore commands from a hijacker and instead take direction from the ground . . . .”

See also this article, in which the former head of British Airways “suggested . . . that aircraft could be commandeered from the groun...

And some allege that the use of remote control could explain some of the strange behavior by the 9/11 planes.  More on the case of drones being used see; http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/airplanes-have-been-flown-remo...